Freight Caviar logo
MSC Infiltrated By Cocaine-Smuggling Cartel? 

MSC Infiltrated By Cocaine-Smuggling Cartel? 

In a statement, Mediterranean Shipping Company, MSC, has denied allegations made in an exposé from Bloomberg that its company has been “infiltrated” by the Balkan drug cartel. 

MSC, founded in 1970 with headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland, is one of the largest shipping companies in the world, operating a fleet of over 700 vessels and present in over 150 countries. It carries an estimated 23 million TEUs annually.

What’s in the report from Bloomberg? 

In 2019, US authorities seized a jaw-dropping 20 tons of cocaine, worth about  $1 billion, from the MSC Gayane at the Port of Philadelphia. Several members of the crew were found guilty in connection with the operations. Due to the magnitude of the crime, authorities seized the entire ship as well. 

In an accompanying Bloomberg Original video, reporters Lauren Etter and Michael Riley detail how such a large-scale operation took place.  They reveal that The MSC Gayane cocaine operation involved eight crew members, including the chief mate, who loaded cocaine onto the ship by crane from smaller boats that sailed alongside the enormous vessel in South American waters. 

Bloomberg goes deeper into the background of these eight workers…

…and discovers that four of them were directly recruited for operations aboard the Gayane. This led them to Montenegro, a country known for skilled seafarer labor. MSC has the biggest shipping recruitment ties to the country, employing over a third of all Montenegrin sailors. 

That’s where the Balkan Cartel comes in. 

Etter explains the widespread control organized criminal groups have had in the Balkan since the breakup of Yugoslavia, the Balkan wars, and the subsequent collapse of the economy. So, Etter goes on, it only makes sense that the Balkan Cartel would target sailors on MSC ships for recruitment in nefarious operations. 

Riley says that MSC was made aware workers were being targeted by Balkan cartels…

…and had ample opportunity to curb the issue. MSC management was reportedly approached by at least three different countries about the problem. The opinion of law officials is that the company did not do enough. But MSC has a different view. 

MSC defends itself in a recent statement

  • They defended their vetting procedure, saying the traffickers used “groundbreaking methods” that could not be foreseen or predicted by any honest shipping company. 
  • They had increased security on ships going from South America to Europe. 
  • Mainly, the company argues that illicit trafficking is an industry-wide problem and that shipping lines and staff are not mandated, resourced, or trained to confront the dangerous individuals who operate organized criminal organizations. 

The Bigger Picture

US authorities have calculated a $600 million fine and want the company to completely forfeit the Gayane in a civil case against the company. MSC has paid $50 million to “bail out” its ship in the meantime. The case is important because it will determine how much, if any, responsibility MSC and other shipping companies bear when incidences like these happen. 

C.H. Robinson Settles Crash Lawsuit After Supreme Court Denial

C.H. Robinson Settles Crash Lawsuit After Supreme Court Denial

C.H. Robinson finally settles a court battle over its responsibility in a 2016 crash that left a man paralyzed, details a report from Transport Drive.

A Timeline of the C.H. Robinson Case:

  • December 2016: A tractor-trailer crashes into a vehicle on a highway in Nevada, leaving motorist Allen Miller a quadriplegic.
  • 2017: Miller files a lawsuit against the brokerage, C.H. Robinson Worldwide, claiming negligence in the crash. The case is filed in federal court.
  • June 2018: Miller’s attorney proposes a settlement of $27.3 million, stating that Miller will require about $545,000 a year for life care costs.
  • November 2018: A U.S. district court rules in favor of C.H. Robinson, stating that federal preemption of the Federal Aviation and Administration Authorization Act applies.
  • But: 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals overturns the district court’s decision and finds that a safety exception to the federal law applies.
  • June 2021: The U.S. Supreme Court denies C.H. Robinson’s request to hear the case.

Despite the company’s vocal pushback…

…which included an op-ed from President and CEO Bob Biesterfeld, the lower court’s ruling stands. According to their interpretation, C.H. Robinson can bear responsibility for the crash because of a safety exception in the Federal Aviation and Administration Authorization Act.

What does this decision mean for other brokerages?

Biesterfeld feels the FMCSA is shirking its responsibility to ensure safety among motor carriers since they set the industry standards. It could be that this decision opens the door for a lot more brokerages and shippers to be held liable for crashes at an unfair frequency.

On the other hand, Miller’s attorney says we don’t see many cases pursuing other brokers because “they’re not negligent. They do vet [carriers].” So, it could end up serving as a wake-up call to increase scrutiny when it comes to who brokers book business with.